Free Evidence-Based Resources for Literacy Success | Funded by the U.S. Department of Education

What Instructional Coaching Is and Is Not

National Center on Improving Literacy

Instructional coaching isn’t another one-off training—it’s a sustained, classroom-embedded approach to professional learning that helps teachers turn evidence-based practices into everyday instruction. In this summary, we break down what instructional coaching is (and isn’t), highlight the features that make it effective, and explain why it matters for improving both teaching practice and student outcomes.

A introductory video from the National Center on Improving Literacy giving an overview of instructional coaching.

What is Instructional Coaching?

Instructional coaching is a type of professional development that is distinct from typical ‘one and done’ training. It is often delivered at the individual-level, involves a long-term relationship between the coach and teacher, and is embedded within a teacher’s specific classroom (Knight, 2009; Kraft et al., 2018). The purpose of instructional coaching is to improve the implementation of evidence-based practices in classrooms (Garbacz et al., 2017.)

Decades of research evaluating the effectiveness of professional development suggest that school or district-wide trainings without follow-up support are ineffective in changing teacher behavior or student outcomes (Desimone, 2009; Garbacz et al., 2015; Kraft et al., 2018). While these trainings may build teacher content knowledge, this rarely translates to the classroom or positively impacts students (Harn et al., 2013). Instead, it is instructional coaching that builds both teacher knowledge and pedagogical skill to improve student outcomes.

What Are Features of Effective Instructional Coaching?

Instructional coaching is most effective when it is focused on one specific area, such as reading instruction. It occurs through a continuous improvement cycle, which may include a pre-conference, demonstration or model lesson, classroom visit, and feedback with goal setting (Knight, 2009).

Effective instructional coaching typically involves observing instruction and providing feedback. Feedback may be in-the-moment/in-vivo or delayed, and may be presented orally or written, remote or in-person. Feedback often occurs over an extended period within the continuous improvement cycle (Knight, 2009).

Coaches provide feedback to shape teacher behavior to improve student outcomes. This is distinctly different than the type of classroom visit or feedback that an administrator may provide for evaluation or teacher tenure decisions. While feedback is critical to effective coaching, it must be non-evaluative.

It can also be helpful to elicit teacher feedback after training and coaching and provide opportunities for goal setting (Knight, 2009). Instructional coaching also involves more difficult to measure intangible components such as gaining teacher buy-in, fostering a willingness to be vulnerable, and establishing trust.

Why is Instructional Coaching Important?

Decades of research on evidence-based practice demonstrate the positive relationship between implementation of evidence-based reading interventions and improved student outcomes (Baker et al., 2010). More recent research has better operationalized how to measure teacher implementation of evidence-based practice (Vaughn et al., 2012). It is hypothesized that follow-up support from instructional coaches may be an active ingredient in carrying out evidence-based practices in classrooms. Ongoing job-embedded professional development is critical to strengthening the use of evidence-based instructional practices and improving student outcomes.

Suggested Citation

National Center on Improving Literacy (2024). Instructional Coaching. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Office of Special Education Programs, National Center on Improving Literacy. Retrieved from https://improvingliteracy.org

References

Baker, S. K., Fien, H., & Baker, D. L. (2010). Robust reading instruction in the early grades: Conceptual and practical issues in the integration and evaluation of tier 1 and tier 2 instructional supports. Focus on Exceptional Children, 42(9), 1-20.

Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational researcher, 38(3), 181-199.

Garbacz, S. A., Lannie, A. L., Jeffrey-Pearsall, J. L., & Truckenmiller, A.  Strategies for effective classroom coaching. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 59(4), 263-273.

Harn, B., Parisi, D., & Stoolmiller, M. (2013). Balancing fidelity with flexibility and fit: What do we really know about fidelity of implementation in schools? Exceptional Children, 79(2), 181-193.

Knight, J. (2009). Coaching: Approaches and perspectives. Corwin Press.

Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of educational research, 88(4), 547-588.

Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., Murray, C. S., & Roberts, G. (2012). Intensive Interventions for Students Struggling in Reading and Mathematics. A Practice Guide. Center on Instruction.

Related Articles